Most EA lists online are highlight reels. This one is an inventory.
I currently run 44 different Expert Advisors across 49 live accounts with $75,196 of my own capital — at 13 brokers, spread over eleven Windows servers. Every single one is listed below: result, maximum unrealised loss, and the seven that cost me money. 37 are up, 7 are down.
I don't sell any of these EAs. I run them, track them daily and publish some of them as signals. What I get out of you reading this: some of the EAs are available through Algo Trading Space, and those links are partner links — same price for you, commission for me. Which is why the same table also shows which of those EAs burned my money.
How to read the numbers
Result is account growth in percent since the account started — not per year, not per month. Runtimes differ; some accounts have been running for over two years, others for a few months. Comparing two rows directly is therefore only so useful.
Max floating loss is the number I actually watch: the largest unrealised loss across all simultaneously open positions, measured against the account. An EA at +12% profit with 85% floating loss once held 85% of my account as an open losing position — the account was close to gone, and the profit is survival luck. The drawdown figures on vendor pages usually count closed trades only, and hide precisely this.
What I leave out: profit factor and recovery metrics. On accounts with few closed trades they produce values like 999 or 0.0 — technically correct, substantively meaningless.
The complete inventory
| EA | Accounts | Capital | Result | Max floating loss | At ATS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum Queen 1K | 1 | $703 | +150.2% | 32.1% | – |
| Gold Matrix EA | 1 | $1,000 | +78.4% | 57.3% | – |
| Chronomax + Meetalgo | 1 | $574 | +66.4% | 41.7% | – |
| Quantum Queen & Windrose | 1 | $2,113 | +57.5% | 16.6% | – |
| Aussie + Market Master | 1 | $890 | +53.6% | 33.6% | Partner link |
| Sentinal AI | 1 | $3,000 | +43.8% | 63.3% | – |
| Dark Titan | 1 | $380 | +43.5% | 34.7% | Partner link |
| MarketMaster EA | 1 | $500 | +41.3% | 62.9% | Partner link |
| Range Go Turn | 1 | $8,407 | +40.6% | 13.7% | – |
| Aussie Victor EA | 1 | $1,009 | +39.0% | 14.3% | Partner link |
| Japan Strike EA | 3 | $2,509 | +37.5% | 27.6% | Partner link |
| Multipair EA EURCAD | 1 | $812 | +35.6% | 19.1% | Partner link |
| Dark Kronos | 1 | $1,812 | +34.8% | 26.2% | Partner link |
| Gold Reaper | 1 | $5,054 | +33.3% | 6.1% | Partner link |
| Quantum Queen | 1 | $500 | +30.2% | 22.4% | – |
| South East EA | 1 | $3,000 | +29.9% | 42.7% | – |
| Quantum Starman | 1 | $1,502 | +23.7% | 83.4% | Partner link |
| Infinity Trade | 1 | $1,000 | +22.2% | 41.0% | Partner link |
| Quantum Queen 3K | 1 | $3,000 | +21.0% | 43.4% | – |
| Market Master 5K | 1 | $5,000 | +19.5% | 16.8% | Partner link |
| Dark Gold | 1 | $520 | +19.4% | 9.9% | Partner link |
| Multipair EA | 2 | $1,874 | +17.5% | 41.5% | Partner link |
| Quantum Emperor | 1 | $1,070 | +12.8% | 21.2% | – |
| Wallstreet Recovery + Ranger | 1 | $950 | +11.9% | 98.7% | Partner link |
| Waka Waka EA | 1 | $3,000 | +10.7% | 26.9% | Partner link |
| Wind Rose EA | 1 | $471 | +8.1% | 20.5% | – |
| Sharpshooter EA | 1 | $1,000 | +7.7% | 24.8% | Partner link |
| Forex Trend Hunter | 1 | $1,000 | +7.5% | 13.4% | Partner link |
| Global Trade Plan | 3 | $600 | +5.7% | 1.6% | Partner link |
| ToTheMoon MT5 | 1 | $1,536 | +5.3% | 5.2% | – |
| Happy Frequency EA | 1 | $898 | +3.8% | 4.3% | Partner link |
| Happy Gold Scalper | 1 | $1,000 | +3.0% | 15.8% | – |
| JapanStrike EA V2.1 | 1 | $1,000 | +2.9% | 4.5% | Partner link |
| Night Hawk EA | 1 | $1,960 | +2.3% | 1.8% | – |
| My Forex Path | 1 | $1,006 | +1.7% | 25.4% | – |
| ToTheMoon | 1 | $1,000 | +1.2% | 1.3% | – |
| Diamond Pro | 1 | $1,000 | +1.1% | 2.6% | – |
| Golden Trade Plan EA | 1 | $1,016 | −1.6% | 1.2% | – |
| Dark Gold (1271) | 1 | $1,271 | −2.6% | 32.9% | Partner link |
| Happy Forex & Multipair | 1 | $2,198 | −2.6% | 98.8% | Partner link |
| Multipair EA GBPUSD | 1 | $855 | −36.7% | 57.4% | Partner link |
| FX Stabilizer | 1 | $5,000 | −38.2% | 40.2% | Partner link |
| ChronomaX | 1 | $500 | −44.3% | 48.4% | – |
| Dark Venus | 1 | $1,706 | −75.3% | 80.7% | Partner link |
Five rows deserve a look before we go on:
- Gold Reaper is the standout: +33.3% at only 6.1% floating loss. Having both at once is rare.
- Global Trade Plan and Happy Frequency return little (+5.7% / +3.8%), but at 1.6% and 4.3% maximum unrealised loss they are quiet enough that I never check them at night.
- Quantum Starman is up +23.7% — at 83.4% floating loss. That account was once nearly gone.
- Happy Forex & MultiPair (98.8%) and Wallstreet Recovery + Ranger (98.7%) are the two accounts that came closest to a total loss. Both sit near break-even today.
- Dark Venus is my most expensive mistake: −75.3%. The EA is switched off.
The steady ones
These four behave the way an EA should: small unrealised loss, steady curve, no night shifts.
Gold Reaper — +33.3% at 6.1% floating loss
XAUUSD breakouts on H1, no grid, no martingale. Runs on $5,054 here and is the only EA in the portfolio earning double digits without meaningfully straining the account. If I had to keep one from this list, this is it. → At Algo Trading Space (partner link)
Global Trade Plan — +5.7% at 1.6% floating loss
Runs on three accounts in parallel here. Earns little but risks almost nothing — the lowest unrealised loss in the entire portfolio. The EA I show newcomers when they ask what "boring" looks like in numbers. → At Algo Trading Space (partner link)
Happy Frequency — +3.8% at 4.3% floating loss
Trend-plus-grid across nine majors. On paper a grid strategy, in my operation surprisingly calm so far — $898 of capital and just over four percent maximum unrealised loss. I don't fully trust the calm: grid strategies look harmless right up until a trend runs against the direction. → At Algo Trading Space (partner link)
Forex Trend Hunter — +7.5% at 13.4% floating loss
Solid middle ground: single-digit profit, unrealised loss within reason, nothing remarkable. Runs on $1,000. → At Algo Trading Space (partner link)
The double-edged ones
The results here are fine, but the path was unpleasant. All four make money — and all four had phases where a third to four fifths of the account sat open as unrealised loss.
Quantum Starman — +23.7% at 83.4% floating loss
The most instructive row in the whole table. The account is up, and I still wouldn't hand this EA to a beginner: at 83% unrealised loss it isn't the strategy that decides whether the account survives, it's chance. → At Algo Trading Space (partner link)
Market Master — +41.3% / +19.5% at 62.9% floating loss
Runs twice here, once on $500 and once on $5,000. The small account shows +41.3% at 62.9% unrealised loss, the large one +19.5% at 16.8% — same EA, different risk setting. That contrast is the clearest evidence that lot size decides drawdown more than the EA does. → At Algo Trading Space (partner link)
Dark Titan — +43.5% at 34.7% floating loss
Strong result on a small account ($380). A third of unrealised loss is the line where I start halving position size. → At Algo Trading Space (partner link)
Dark Kronos — +34.8% at 26.2% floating loss
CHF pairs with ADX signals. For me the best compromise in this group: decent profit, unrealised loss still in explainable territory. → At Algo Trading Space (partner link)
Aussie Victor — +39.0% at 14.3% floating loss
Almost belongs in the first group: +39% at 14.3% unrealised loss on $1,009. Combined with Market Master on a shared account, however, unrealised loss rose to 33.6% — a good reminder that two calm EAs together need not stay calm. → At Algo Trading Space (partner link)
What cost money
Seven EAs are down. Four of them are available through ATS, and I link those the same way — showing only the winners sells advertising, not experience.
Dark Venus — −75.3% at 80.7% floating loss
Bollinger reversal plus grid recovery, available free at ATS. The result is why "free" tells you nothing about the cost of an EA: $1,706 committed, three quarters gone, account switched off. The strategy works as long as the market comes back — and that is not a strategy. → At Algo Trading Space (partner link)
MultiPair EA — from +17.5% to −36.7%, depending on the pair
Same EA on three accounts: EURCAD +35.6%, the standard setup +17.5%, GBPUSD −36.7% at 57.4% unrealised loss. An EA isn't good or bad, it fits an instrument or it doesn't. Whoever buys it buys the job of finding that out. → At Algo Trading Space (partner link)
FX Stabilizer — −38.2% at 40.2% floating loss
"Low risk, high consistency" per the description, $5,000 committed, 38% lost. The EA with the widest gap between sales promise and my account. → At Algo Trading Space (partner link)
Happy Forex & MultiPair — −2.6% at 98.8% floating loss
The worst row in the table, even though the result looks nearly neutral. 98.8% unrealised loss means the account was tied up to within about one percent. One tick further and it would have been a margin call. That this ends at only −2.6% is luck, not skill. → At Algo Trading Space (partner link)
The three remaining losers — ChronomaX (−44.3%), Golden Trade Plan (−1.6%) and Dark Gold on the second account (−2.6%) — are either not available through ATS or listed there under a different name. All of them are in the table above.
Where the accounts sit
The 49 accounts sit at 13 brokers. Eleven of them are listed here with numbers — AvaTrade (2 accounts) and NAGA (1 account) carry too little capital to conclude anything from. Together the eleven cover 46 accounts and $73,008 of the $75,196.
| Broker | Accounts | Capital | Partner link |
|---|---|---|---|
 RoboForex | 19 | $23,695 | Open account |
 IC Markets | 7 | $19,596 | Open account |
 IC Trading | 4 | $10,778 | Open account |
 BlackBull | 5 | $10,105 | Open account |
 Eightcap | 4 | $5,389 | Open account |
 Vantage Markets | 2 | $1,000 | Open account |
 VT Markets | 1 | $1,271 | Open account |
 XM | 1 | $574 | Open account |
 FP Markets | 1 | $200 | Open account |
 Fusion Markets | 1 | $200 | Open account |
 Ultima Markets | 1 | $200 | Open account |
Why so many: not every broker permits every strategy. Scalping EAs need raw spreads and execution without requotes, grid EAs need leverage and margin headroom, and a signal I offer publicly has to be copyable at that broker. That RoboForex carries almost half the park with 19 accounts has a single reason: CopyFX runs there — the copy trading through which others subscribe to my strategies.
The second reason is less comfortable: a broker is counterparty risk. I don't spread the capital because it's convenient — 49 accounts at 13 brokers is work — but because a single broker with payout problems would otherwise hit the entire portfolio. The links above are partner links, like the EA links: same price for you, commission for me. Which broker suits which strategy is in the broker reviews — same scoring logic and the same six criteria as for the EAs.
What I do differently after 44 EAs
Floating loss decides, not return. None of the EAs that exceeded 50% unrealised loss still runs with serious capital. Almost every one below 15% still does.
Same strategy, two accounts, two worlds. Market Master at +41% / 63% unrealised loss versus +20% / 17% — the difference was lot size, not the EA. Buying an EA and keeping the default settings means buying somebody else's risk decision.
Free is not an argument. Dark Venus was free and is my most expensive EA.
Combinations add risk, not safety. Aussie Victor alone: 14.3% unrealised loss. Together with Market Master on one account: 33.6%. Two EAs on one account share the same margin — when both are wrong at once, the account pays twice.
The instrument matters more than the EA. MultiPair on EURCAD +35.6%, on GBPUSD −36.7%. Same code, same week, 72 percentage points apart.
If you'd rather compute this yourself than trust screenshots: my portfolio tracker pulls in MT4 and MT5 accounts and shows combined drawdown and correlation across all EAs — free, because this exact view is what I was missing when I opened my third account.
How I rate brokers and EAs is in the open methodology. The individual EA tests with full scoring are under EA reviews.